<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: All-new DNS Service Coming on October 8, 2009</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.opensrs.com/blog/2009/10/all-new-dns-service-coming-on-october-8-2009/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.opensrs.com/blog/2009/10/all-new-dns-service-coming-on-october-8-2009/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=all-new-dns-service-coming-on-october-8-2009</link>
	<description>Happenings at OpenSRS. Talk of Domain Names, Email and SSL</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 04 Feb 2012 11:59:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Andy</title>
		<link>http://www.opensrs.com/blog/2009/10/all-new-dns-service-coming-on-october-8-2009/#comment-916</link>
		<dc:creator>Andy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 11 Oct 2009 12:48:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://opensrs.com/index.php?option=com_wordpress&#038;p=3736&#038;Itemid=149#comment-916</guid>
		<description>I&#039;ve taken a look at this and whilst I welcome the move to incorporate DNS into the main OpenSRS control panel, I&#039;m surprised that you haven&#039;t used standard, i.e. BIND, formatting for the entries.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve taken a look at this and whilst I welcome the move to incorporate DNS into the main OpenSRS control panel, I&#8217;m surprised that you haven&#8217;t used standard, i.e. BIND, formatting for the entries.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Eric Longman</title>
		<link>http://www.opensrs.com/blog/2009/10/all-new-dns-service-coming-on-october-8-2009/#comment-915</link>
		<dc:creator>Eric Longman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 Oct 2009 15:57:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://opensrs.com/index.php?option=com_wordpress&#038;p=3736&#038;Itemid=149#comment-915</guid>
		<description>Although I very much like the fact that the provisioning has been streamlined and integrated with the RWI, overall the service seems to be a step backward from the old service.

The interface has been dumbed down too far!

For example, the new system simply won&#039;t allow you to set up multiple &#039;A&#039; records for a given subdomain pointing to different addresses.  Try, for example, setting up a domain to use Google AdSense for Domains.  It&#039;s not possible to do it correctly, since the Google approach requires setting up four &#039;A&#039; records for the domain, each pointing to a different IP.

The old system handles this with no problem.

I&#039;ve submitted a ticket to support about this specific problem, but overall I have to say that I&#039;m disappointed with the new management interface compared to the old one.

Regards,
Eric Longman
zConnect</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Although I very much like the fact that the provisioning has been streamlined and integrated with the RWI, overall the service seems to be a step backward from the old service.</p>
<p>The interface has been dumbed down too far!</p>
<p>For example, the new system simply won&#8217;t allow you to set up multiple &#8216;A&#8217; records for a given subdomain pointing to different addresses.  Try, for example, setting up a domain to use Google AdSense for Domains.  It&#8217;s not possible to do it correctly, since the Google approach requires setting up four &#8216;A&#8217; records for the domain, each pointing to a different IP.</p>
<p>The old system handles this with no problem.</p>
<p>I&#8217;ve submitted a ticket to support about this specific problem, but overall I have to say that I&#8217;m disappointed with the new management interface compared to the old one.</p>
<p>Regards,<br />
Eric Longman<br />
zConnect</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Adam Eisner</title>
		<link>http://www.opensrs.com/blog/2009/10/all-new-dns-service-coming-on-october-8-2009/#comment-914</link>
		<dc:creator>Adam Eisner</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Oct 2009 12:12:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://opensrs.com/index.php?option=com_wordpress&#038;p=3736&#038;Itemid=149#comment-914</guid>
		<description>Thanks! We try.  :)  Kidding aside, though, the goal was to make it as easy as possible, and I think we&#039;ve done a good job there. We&#039;re very excited for tomorrow&#039;s release.

Adam</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks! We try.  <img src='http://www.opensrs.com/blog/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' />   Kidding aside, though, the goal was to make it as easy as possible, and I think we&#8217;ve done a good job there. We&#8217;re very excited for tomorrow&#8217;s release.</p>
<p>Adam</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: bportlock</title>
		<link>http://www.opensrs.com/blog/2009/10/all-new-dns-service-coming-on-october-8-2009/#comment-913</link>
		<dc:creator>bportlock</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 05 Oct 2009 09:09:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://opensrs.com/index.php?option=com_wordpress&#038;p=3736&#038;Itemid=149#comment-913</guid>
		<description>Whey-hey! Fantastic.

This is a really good move. I have been working on some code recently and this allows me to simplify it massively by removing the redundant order previously required.

I note that the documentation has already been updated and this looks a lot simpler.

As far as I&#039;m concerned, you could not have timed it better.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Whey-hey! Fantastic.</p>
<p>This is a really good move. I have been working on some code recently and this allows me to simplify it massively by removing the redundant order previously required.</p>
<p>I note that the documentation has already been updated and this looks a lot simpler.</p>
<p>As far as I&#8217;m concerned, you could not have timed it better.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

